advertising
print page Print  email page Email 


Other Articles

Bookend

Executive Decision

Megan Murphy

What book should every businessperson be reading right...


Lessons Learned in Merging Well

How to maintain your culture when you get bought out


Hit the Deck

New and unusual options in outdoor dining


How the Best Was Won

A roundup of the 2008 Best Companies to Work For in Washington and what makes them great places to...


The House That Henrybuilt

A dot-com refugee finds success using his hands


A Q&A with Jennifer Sizemore

Jennifer Sizemore is vice president and editor-in-chief of Redmondbased MSNBC.com and an executive...


Heavy Metal Mania

Car collectors are drawn to the smooth lines, the storied pasts, the powerful engines ... gas...


Auto Biography

We love our cars and showing them off. Do you drive something cool? Classic? Out of this world?...


The Human Factor

Tech services firm Allyis treats workers like real people,

and - surprise! - they stick around


Boeing's Delivery Not at all That Speedy

Boeing failure to deliver on recent defense contracts was a key reason the Air Force didn't pick it to fill a $40 billion contract for refueling tankers. Lexington Institute analyst Loren Thompson says the decision "was not a close outcome." Based on their track records, Northrop Grumman and EADS, not Boeing, were judged better able to deliver the tankers on time, he says, plus the KC-30 was considered a more capable plane. Top Pentagon weapons buyer Susan Payton said her team didn't consider the impact on U.S. jobs, but instead "balanced the requirements of the war fighter with the best interests of the taxpayer."   

Comments

Leave a Reply


If you can't read the word, click here.

CAPTCHA image for SPAM prevention

advertising

© Washington CEO Magazine 2008