advertising
print page Print  email page Email 


Other Articles

The Military Complex

The military is Washington state's third-largest employer. Mouse over to our interactive graphic...


The Human Factor

Tech services firm Allyis treats workers like real people,

and - surprise! - they stick around


The House That Henrybuilt

A dot-com refugee finds success using his hands


Gone to the Dogs

Washington's canine love affair pays the bills for these doggie daycare entrepreneurs


A Q&A with Jennifer Sizemore

Jennifer Sizemore is vice president and editor-in-chief of Redmondbased MSNBC.com and an executive...


Tour Vancouver

Take a slideshow tour of Vancouver, Wash., Washington's fourth-largest city, with additional...


Bookend

Executive Decision

Megan Murphy

What book should every businessperson be reading right...


Lessons Learned in Merging Well

How to maintain your culture when you get bought out


Green Washington Awards

Visit our photo gallery from our first Green Washington Awards banquet. Spot the Senator.


Boeing's Delivery Not at all That Speedy

Boeing failure to deliver on recent defense contracts was a key reason the Air Force didn't pick it to fill a $40 billion contract for refueling tankers. Lexington Institute analyst Loren Thompson says the decision "was not a close outcome." Based on their track records, Northrop Grumman and EADS, not Boeing, were judged better able to deliver the tankers on time, he says, plus the KC-30 was considered a more capable plane. Top Pentagon weapons buyer Susan Payton said her team didn't consider the impact on U.S. jobs, but instead "balanced the requirements of the war fighter with the best interests of the taxpayer."   

Comments

Leave a Reply


If you can't read the word, click here.

CAPTCHA image for SPAM prevention

advertising

© Washington CEO Magazine 2008